Sigma stage represents a statistical measure of course of functionality, indicating the frequency of defects or errors in a course of. It is calculated by figuring out what number of customary deviations a course of’s imply is from its nearest specification restrict (both higher or decrease). The next sigma stage signifies a extra succesful course of with fewer defects. For instance, a course of working at a 6-sigma stage implies a defect price of three.4 defects per million alternatives (DPMO), whereas a 3-sigma course of ends in a considerably increased DPMO. The calculation entails assessing the method’s variation and evaluating it in opposition to customer-defined specs.
This metric’s significance lies in its means to quantify course of efficiency and drive steady enchancment initiatives. Greater course of functionality interprets to diminished prices related to rework, scrap, and buyer dissatisfaction. Traditionally, the adoption of this system has enabled organizations to optimize their operations, enhance product high quality, and improve total competitiveness. Its predictive energy permits proactive identification and mitigation of potential course of failures.
Understanding the specifics of calculating this metric entails a number of key parts. These embody knowledge assortment strategies, statistical evaluation strategies, and the interpretation of outcomes throughout the context of the method beneath analysis. Subsequent sections will delve into the sensible steps concerned on this calculation, highlighting related formulation and issues for correct evaluation.
1. Knowledge Assortment
Knowledge assortment constitutes the foundational factor within the strategy of evaluating course of functionality utilizing the sigma stage metric. Its accuracy and comprehensiveness instantly influence the validity of all subsequent calculations. With out dependable knowledge, the derived sigma stage will present a deceptive illustration of precise course of efficiency.
-
Knowledge Accuracy
Knowledge accuracy refers back to the diploma to which collected knowledge displays the true values throughout the course of. Inaccurate knowledge introduces errors into the calculation of the imply, customary deviation, and in the end, the sigma stage. For instance, in a producing context, mismeasured dimensions of a product will result in an incorrect evaluation of dimensional functionality. Exact and calibrated measuring devices, coupled with standardized knowledge assortment protocols, are important to make sure knowledge accuracy.
-
Knowledge Representativeness
Knowledge representativeness addresses the extent to which the collected knowledge pattern precisely displays all the inhabitants or course of being assessed. A non-representative pattern can result in skewed outcomes and an inaccurate sigma stage calculation. As an example, if solely knowledge from one shift in a three-shift operation is analyzed, the ensuing sigma stage might not precisely mirror the potential of the method throughout all shifts. Random sampling strategies and consideration of course of variability are essential for making certain knowledge representativeness.
-
Knowledge Integrity
Knowledge integrity considerations the completeness and consistency of the collected knowledge. Lacking knowledge or inconsistencies arising from completely different assortment strategies compromise the reliability of the sigma stage calculation. For instance, if knowledge factors are lacking from a important interval of course of operation, the calculated sigma stage might not precisely mirror all the course of efficiency. Sturdy knowledge administration techniques and standardized knowledge assortment procedures are obligatory to take care of knowledge integrity.
-
Knowledge Relevance
Knowledge relevance pertains to the inclusion of solely knowledge factors which are pertinent to the method being analyzed for the willpower of its functionality. Irrelevant knowledge provides noise to the evaluation and may result in a skewed results of the sigma stage. For instance, knowledge pertaining to course of inputs that aren’t managed throughout the scope of the examine might distort the reflection of the particular course of efficiency. Clear parameters defining related knowledge are key to the evaluation.
The aforementioned aspects of knowledge assortment collectively underscore the important function it performs in precisely figuring out sigma stage. Compromises in any of those areas introduce uncertainty into the ultimate calculation, probably resulting in flawed decision-making concerning course of enchancment methods. The rigor utilized throughout knowledge assortment units the stage for a significant and dependable evaluation of course of functionality.
2. Course of Imply
The method imply, representing the typical output of a given course of, is a basic parameter in figuring out its functionality. Its correct calculation and understanding are essential when aiming to evaluate course of efficiency utilizing sigma stage. The place of the method imply relative to the specification limits instantly influences the calculated sigma stage; subsequently, an intensive examination of its elements is crucial.
-
Central Tendency
The method imply serves as a measure of central tendency, indicating the place the majority of the method output is centered. As an example, in a producing context, if the goal dimension of a component is 10mm, and the method imply is constantly measured at 9.8mm, it suggests a scientific deviation. This offset instantly reduces the potential sigma stage, as the method is inherently nearer to one of many specification limits, rising the chance of defects on that facet.
-
Stability Over Time
The steadiness of the method imply over time is a important consideration. A course of with a shifting imply introduces variability past the inherent course of variation, negatively impacting the sigma stage. In a chemical course of, variations in temperature or strain might trigger the imply yield of a response to shift, resulting in inconsistent product high quality. Management charts are sometimes employed to observe the steadiness of the method imply and detect any vital shifts or tendencies.
-
Sensitivity to Inputs
The method imply is delicate to modifications in enter variables. Alterations in uncooked materials high quality, machine settings, or operator strategies can induce shifts within the course of imply. If the enter voltage to a machine will increase, then the machine can over-perform to trigger the tip product to have a better imply worth, inflicting shifts within the ultimate product. Understanding these relationships is important for sustaining a steady course of imply and attaining a desired sigma stage. Designed experiments can be utilized to determine essentially the most influential enter variables and optimize course of settings.
-
Relationship to Specification Limits
The gap between the method imply and the closest specification restrict is a major determinant of the method functionality, which is instantly mirrored within the sigma stage. If the imply is centered between the higher and decrease specification limits, the method has the utmost potential for attaining a excessive sigma stage. Conversely, a imply that’s considerably offset from the middle reduces this potential, even when the method variation is small. Course of centering efforts are subsequently important for maximizing the sigma stage.
In abstract, the method imply shouldn’t be merely a easy common however a important indicator of course of efficiency and potential. Its stability, sensitivity to inputs, and place relative to the specification limits all instantly affect the calculated sigma stage. By understanding and managing these aspects of the method imply, organizations can successfully improve course of functionality and cut back defects, in the end resulting in improved high quality and effectivity.
3. Normal Deviation
Normal deviation is a important statistical measure that quantifies the quantity of variation or dispersion inside a dataset. Within the context of assessing course of functionality, customary deviation performs an indispensable function in figuring out the sigma stage. It supplies a measure of the inherent course of variability, which instantly impacts how shut the method output is to assembly specified necessities. The connection between customary deviation and sigma stage is inverse: a decrease customary deviation ends in a better sigma stage, indicating a extra constant and succesful course of.
-
Quantifying Course of Variability
Normal deviation serves as the first metric for quantifying the inherent variability inside a course of. As an example, in a bottling plant, the usual deviation of the fill quantity signifies the extent to which particular person bottles deviate from the goal fill quantity. A smaller customary deviation signifies that the fill volumes are constantly near the goal, whereas a bigger customary deviation suggests better inconsistency. This variability instantly impacts the sigma stage, as elevated variation reduces the chance of constantly assembly specified fill quantity limits.
-
Influence on Z-Rating
The Z-score, a important element in calculating the sigma stage, is set by the distinction between the method imply and the specification restrict, divided by the usual deviation. Thus, the magnitude of the usual deviation instantly influences the Z-score. A smaller customary deviation ends in a bigger Z-score, signifying that the method imply is additional away from the specification restrict when it comes to customary deviations. This bigger Z-score interprets to a better sigma stage, indicating improved course of functionality.
-
Affect on Defect Fee
The usual deviation instantly impacts the defect price of a course of. A bigger customary deviation will increase the likelihood of observations falling exterior the desired limits, leading to a better defect price. Take into account a producing course of producing elements with a specified diameter. If the usual deviation of the diameter is massive, extra elements will fall exterior the appropriate diameter vary, resulting in a better variety of faulty components. This elevated defect price instantly corresponds to a decrease sigma stage, reflecting the decreased course of functionality.
-
Course of Enchancment Goal
Lowering the usual deviation is commonly a major goal in course of enchancment initiatives geared toward rising the sigma stage. By figuring out and addressing the sources of course of variation, organizations can cut back the usual deviation and enhance course of consistency. For instance, in a name middle, lowering the variation in name dealing with instances amongst completely different brokers will decrease the usual deviation of name durations, bettering total effectivity and buyer satisfaction. This discount in customary deviation interprets on to a rise within the sigma stage, reflecting the improved course of efficiency.
In conclusion, customary deviation is inextricably linked to the evaluation of course of functionality utilizing the sigma stage. It quantifies course of variability, instantly impacts the Z-score and defect price, and serves as a key goal for course of enchancment efforts. By understanding and successfully managing the usual deviation, organizations can considerably improve their course of functionality and obtain increased sigma ranges, resulting in improved high quality and effectivity.
4. Specification Limits
Specification limits are important boundaries that outline the appropriate vary of variation for a product or course of attribute. Their relationship to sigma stage calculation is key, as they set up the standards in opposition to which course of efficiency is measured. With out clearly outlined and applicable specification limits, the calculation of sigma stage turns into meaningless, as there isn’t any benchmark for figuring out course of functionality.
-
Defining Acceptable Variation
Specification limits demarcate the boundaries inside which a services or products should fall to be thought-about acceptable. These limits are sometimes dictated by buyer necessities, regulatory requirements, or inside design parameters. For instance, in pharmaceutical manufacturing, the specification limits for the lively ingredient focus in a pill are tightly managed to make sure efficacy and security. These limits instantly affect the sigma stage calculation, as a wider tolerance vary typically permits for a better sigma stage, assuming the method imply is centered.
-
Influence on Z-Rating Calculation
The Z-score, a key element in figuring out the sigma stage, is calculated based mostly on the distinction between the method imply and the closest specification restrict, divided by the usual deviation. Due to this fact, the situation of the specification limits instantly impacts the Z-score. If the specification limits are set too tightly, the Z-score can be decrease, leading to a decrease sigma stage, even when the method reveals low variability. Conversely, overly broad specification limits can inflate the Z-score and result in an artificially excessive sigma stage, masking potential course of points.
-
Affect on Defect Fee Estimation
Specification limits instantly decide the world beneath the method distribution that falls exterior the appropriate vary, which represents the defect price. The sigma stage is basically a statistical illustration of this defect price. Tighter specification limits will invariably lead to a better estimated defect price for a given course of distribution, resulting in a decrease sigma stage. As an example, within the automotive {industry}, if the specification limits for the diameter of a piston are narrowed, the variety of pistons falling exterior these limits will enhance, thus reducing the calculated sigma stage.
-
Relationship to Course of Centering
The effectiveness of a course of, as measured by sigma stage, can be influenced by how effectively the method is centered between the specification limits. Even with a small customary deviation, if the method imply is considerably off-center, the method can be nearer to one of many specification limits, rising the chance of defects on that facet. Due to this fact, the relative positioning of the method imply with respect to the specification limits is essential. The nearer the method imply is to the midpoint between the specification limits, the upper the potential sigma stage, given a constant customary deviation.
The interdependence between specification limits and sigma stage calculation is simple. Applicable specification limits, along with course of centering and minimized variation, are important for attaining a excessive sigma stage, which signifies a sturdy and succesful course of. The institution and administration of specification limits are subsequently integral to any effort geared toward bettering course of efficiency and lowering defects. The correct translation of buyer wants and regulatory necessities into significant and achievable specification limits is a vital first step within the pursuit of course of excellence.
5. Z-score Calculation
Z-score calculation is a pivotal step in quantifying course of functionality utilizing the sigma stage metric. It standardizes course of efficiency by expressing the gap between the method imply and the specification limits when it comes to customary deviations. This standardization facilitates comparability of course of efficiency throughout completely different processes and industries, offering a constant measure of course of effectiveness.
-
Standardizing Course of Knowledge
The Z-score converts uncooked course of knowledge right into a standardized metric, eradicating the affect of the unique measurement items. As an example, contemplate two processes: one measuring size in millimeters and one other measuring weight in grams. The Z-score permits for a direct comparability of their efficiency relative to their respective specification limits, regardless of the measurement scale. This standardization permits goal evaluation and benchmarking of course of functionality.
-
Figuring out Course of Distance from Specification Limits
The Z-score signifies what number of customary deviations the method imply is away from the closest specification restrict. The next Z-score signifies that the method imply is additional away from the specification restrict, indicating a decrease likelihood of defects. For instance, a Z-score of three implies that the method imply is three customary deviations from the specification restrict, suggesting a comparatively low defect price. This relationship supplies a quantifiable measure of course of robustness.
-
Enabling Sigma Stage Conversion
The Z-score instantly interprets into the sigma stage. The sigma stage represents the method functionality when it comes to the variety of customary deviations that match between the method imply and the closest specification restrict. A Z-score of 1 corresponds to a 1-sigma stage, a Z-score of two corresponds to a 2-sigma stage, and so forth. This conversion permits for a standardized illustration of course of functionality, facilitating communication and understanding throughout completely different capabilities and organizations.
-
Facilitating Course of Enchancment Selections
The Z-score supplies actionable insights for course of enchancment. A low Z-score signifies that the method is both too variable, off-center, or each. This info can information focused enchancment efforts, reminiscent of lowering course of variation, centering the method imply, or widening the specification limits (if possible). For instance, if a course of has a low Z-score on account of extreme variation, efforts may be targeted on figuring out and eliminating the basis causes of this variation.
In essence, the Z-score calculation supplies a important hyperlink between uncooked course of knowledge and the sigma stage metric. It standardizes course of efficiency, quantifies course of distance from specification limits, permits sigma stage conversion, and facilitates knowledgeable course of enchancment choices. By precisely calculating and deciphering the Z-score, organizations can successfully assess and improve their course of functionality.
6. DPMO Conversion
Defects Per Million Alternatives (DPMO) conversion is an important step in translating course of efficiency right into a sigma stage. It quantifies the variety of defects noticed inside a course of relative to the whole variety of alternatives for defects, offering a standardized metric instantly linked to course of functionality and the willpower of sigma stage.
-
Quantifying Defect Fee
DPMO conversion supplies a standardized methodology for quantifying the defect price of a course of, regardless of its complexity or scale. It normalizes the variety of defects noticed by contemplating the variety of alternatives for defects throughout the course of. For instance, in a mortgage utility course of with a number of steps, every step represents a possibility for error. The DPMO displays the variety of incorrect mortgage functions per million utility steps, providing a transparent image of the error price. This defect price then instantly informs the willpower of sigma stage.
-
Relating Defect Fee to Course of Functionality
The calculated DPMO worth is instantly associated to the method functionality. Decrease DPMO values point out increased course of functionality, suggesting that the method constantly produces outputs inside acceptable limits. Conversely, increased DPMO values signify decrease course of functionality, indicating a better propensity for errors or defects. A producing course of with a DPMO of three.4 corresponds to a 6-sigma stage, indicating distinctive functionality. The inverse relationship between DPMO and course of functionality is key to the sigma stage calculation.
-
Enabling Sigma Stage Estimation
DPMO conversion is a important step in estimating the sigma stage of a course of. The DPMO worth is used along with statistical tables or software program to find out the corresponding sigma stage. The sigma stage represents the variety of customary deviations that match between the method imply and the closest specification restrict. By changing the DPMO right into a sigma stage, organizations can quantify their course of functionality in a standardized and universally understood metric. This conversion permits for benchmarking in opposition to {industry} requirements and facilitates focused enchancment efforts.
-
Driving Course of Enchancment Efforts
The DPMO worth serves as a key driver for course of enchancment initiatives. By monitoring the DPMO over time, organizations can monitor the effectiveness of their enchancment efforts and determine areas the place additional intervention is required. An rising DPMO signifies a decline in course of efficiency, signaling the necessity for corrective motion. For instance, if a name middle observes a rise in DPMO associated to incorrect info supplied to prospects, it will probably implement coaching applications to enhance agent information and cut back errors. The DPMO subsequently supplies a tangible metric for guiding and evaluating course of enchancment actions.
In abstract, DPMO conversion bridges the hole between noticed defects and the standardized measure of sigma stage. It quantifies defect charges, relates them to course of functionality, permits sigma stage estimation, and drives focused course of enchancment efforts, making it an indispensable element of course of administration and sigma stage calculation. By fastidiously analyzing DPMO values, organizations can acquire priceless insights into their course of efficiency and take proactive steps to enhance high quality and effectivity.
7. Functionality Evaluation
Functionality evaluation, within the context of course of enchancment, is inextricably linked to calculating sigma stage. The calculation itself serves because the quantitative output of a broader functionality evaluation. A functionality evaluation seeks to know a course of’s inherent means to satisfy specified necessities or buyer expectations constantly. Figuring out sigma stage supplies a exact, measurable indicator of this means. The info gathered through the evaluation phasemeasuring course of inputs and outputs, figuring out sources of variation, and defining specification limitsforms the idea for sigma stage calculation. A poorly executed functionality evaluation, missing correct knowledge or clearly outlined metrics, will inevitably result in a deceptive or inaccurate sigma stage calculation. For instance, if a producing course of is assessed solely throughout a interval of optimum operation, the calculated sigma stage will probably overestimate the method’s true functionality, masking potential issues that happen beneath completely different working circumstances or with various enter supplies.
Moreover, the insights gained from a functionality evaluation lengthen past a single sigma stage worth. The evaluation identifies the components limiting course of functionality, informing focused enchancment efforts. Suppose a sigma stage calculation reveals a low course of functionality. The related functionality evaluation ought to pinpoint the basis causes of the defects or variability, enabling targeted interventions. This might contain addressing tools points, refining course of parameters, bettering operator coaching, or implementing statistical course of management measures. With out the context supplied by the potential evaluation, the sigma stage calculation stays an remoted metric, providing restricted steering for sensible enchancment. The evaluation supplies the diagnostic info essential to translate the sigma stage into actionable methods.
In abstract, functionality evaluation shouldn’t be merely a precursor to calculating sigma stage; it’s an integral element of all the course of enchancment cycle. The sigma stage calculation supplies a quantifiable measure of course of functionality, whereas the evaluation provides the diagnostic insights wanted to drive significant and sustainable enhancements. Challenges might come up from insufficient knowledge assortment strategies or a lack of knowledge of course of variability, emphasizing the necessity for strong statistical evaluation and course of information. Finally, the understanding derived from the synergistic relationship between functionality evaluation and sigma stage calculation results in optimized processes, diminished defects, and enhanced buyer satisfaction.
Often Requested Questions
This part addresses widespread inquiries associated to the calculation of sigma stage, providing clarification and steering on finest practices.
Query 1: Is specialised software program essential to calculate sigma stage?
Whereas not strictly obligatory, using statistical software program packages considerably streamlines the calculation course of, notably for giant datasets or advanced analyses. These instruments automate the calculations of course of imply, customary deviation, and Z-scores, minimizing the potential for human error and bettering effectivity. Guide calculation is feasible, however requires meticulous consideration to element and a robust understanding of statistical formulation.
Query 2: What constitutes a suitable pattern dimension for correct sigma stage calculation?
The required pattern dimension will depend on the method variability and desired stage of confidence. As a basic guideline, a minimal of 30 knowledge factors is beneficial for a preliminary evaluation. Nevertheless, for processes with excessive variability or when a better diploma of precision is required, bigger pattern sizes, probably exceeding 100 knowledge factors, could also be obligatory to make sure statistical significance and correct illustration of course of efficiency.
Query 3: How ought to non-normal knowledge distributions be dealt with when calculating sigma stage?
Sigma stage calculations sometimes assume a standard knowledge distribution. If the info deviates considerably from normality, transformations, reminiscent of Field-Cox or Johnson transformations, may be utilized to approximate a standard distribution. Alternatively, non-parametric strategies, which don’t depend on distributional assumptions, can be utilized to estimate course of functionality. The collection of an applicable methodology will depend on the particular traits of the info and the specified stage of accuracy.
Query 4: Are there industry-specific requirements for outlining specification limits in sigma stage calculations?
Whereas basic ideas of statistical course of management apply throughout industries, particular requirements for outlining specification limits might fluctuate. Sure sectors, reminiscent of prescription drugs and aerospace, usually adhere to stringent regulatory tips and inside high quality requirements that dictate how specification limits are established. Understanding and complying with related industry-specific requirements is essential for correct and significant sigma stage calculations.
Query 5: How does one account for course of drift or shifts when calculating sigma stage?
Course of drift or shifts can considerably influence the accuracy of sigma stage calculations. Management charts ought to be used to observe course of stability over time. If drift or shifts are detected, knowledge ought to be segmented into steady durations and analyzed individually. Alternatively, statistical strategies designed to account for non-stationarity, reminiscent of time collection evaluation, may be employed to mannequin and mitigate the consequences of course of drift.
Query 6: What’s the distinction between short-term and long-term sigma stage, and when ought to every be used?
Brief-term sigma stage displays course of functionality beneath managed circumstances, sometimes over a comparatively quick interval. It doesn’t account for long-term variations, reminiscent of shifts in operators, supplies, or tools. Lengthy-term sigma stage incorporates these sources of variation, offering a extra real looking evaluation of total course of efficiency. Brief-term sigma stage is beneficial for assessing the potential of a course of, whereas long-term sigma stage supplies a extra correct reflection of sustained efficiency over time.
In abstract, correct sigma stage calculation requires cautious consideration to knowledge high quality, applicable statistical strategies, and an intensive understanding of the method being assessed. These FAQs spotlight important issues for making certain the validity and utility of sigma stage as a course of enchancment device.
The next part will delve into the sensible utility of sigma stage inside numerous industries.
Important Concerns for Sigma Stage Calculation
This part highlights important points to think about when figuring out a course of’s sigma stage to make sure accuracy and relevance of the outcomes.
Tip 1: Guarantee Knowledge Integrity: The inspiration of any statistical evaluation is dependable knowledge. Prioritize correct and constant knowledge assortment strategies. Recurrently calibrate measuring devices and implement strong knowledge validation procedures to attenuate errors and omissions. For instance, when measuring product dimensions, use calibrated calipers and confirm measurements with a second operator to scale back measurement bias.
Tip 2: Account for Course of Stability: Sigma stage calculations assume course of stability. Make use of management charts to observe course of efficiency over time. Deal with any recognized course of shifts or tendencies earlier than calculating sigma stage to stop skewed outcomes. For instance, if a management chart reveals a sudden shift within the course of imply, examine and rectify the reason for the shift earlier than continuing with the sigma stage calculation.
Tip 3: Select the Applicable Specification Limits: Specification limits should precisely mirror buyer necessities or regulatory requirements. Keep away from utilizing arbitrary or overly tight specification limits, as they will artificially decrease the calculated sigma stage. Equally, overly broad specification limits might masks underlying course of points. Have interaction stakeholders to outline real looking and achievable specification limits that align with course of capabilities and efficiency expectations.
Tip 4: Validate Normality Assumption: Many sigma stage calculations depend on the idea of a standard knowledge distribution. Use statistical checks, such because the Shapiro-Wilk take a look at or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov take a look at, to confirm this assumption. If the info is non-normal, contemplate making use of knowledge transformations or utilizing non-parametric strategies to calculate course of functionality.
Tip 5: Distinguish Brief-Time period and Lengthy-Time period Variation: Acknowledge the distinction between short-term and long-term variation and choose the suitable statistical strategies accordingly. Brief-term sigma stage displays course of functionality beneath managed circumstances, whereas long-term sigma stage accounts for the consequences of varied sources of variation over time. Select the sigma stage metric that finest displays the meant utility and decision-making context.
Tip 6: Perceive Z-Rating and Its Influence: Keep in mind that the Z-score is the variety of customary deviations the method imply is from the closest specification restrict. This worth is essential as a result of it dictates the sigma stage achieved by the method. Guarantee its appropriate calculation, and be aware that an off-center course of requires better consideration to variability discount to attain a excessive sigma stage.
Tip 7: Take into account the Alternatives for Defects: Correct DPMO conversion requires clearly outlined alternatives for defects throughout the course of. Guarantee to incorporate each potential incidence the place a defect can happen. An underestimation of alternatives will result in incorrect DPMO calculations and consequently an inaccurate sigma stage.
Adhering to those important issues enhances the accuracy and reliability of sigma stage calculations, offering a extra significant evaluation of course of functionality. Correct assessments are important for driving efficient course of enchancment initiatives and attaining operational excellence.
With a agency grasp of those key issues, the following sections will discover real-world functions, emphasizing the sensible utilization of this data to drive tangible enhancements throughout all kinds of operational sectors.
Conclusion
The previous evaluation clarifies calculate sigma stage, emphasizing the multi-faceted strategy required for correct evaluation. Knowledge integrity, course of stability, appropriately outlined specification limits, and cautious consideration of statistical assumptions are all important elements. The calculation, when executed appropriately, yields a quantifiable measure of course of functionality, expressed as a sigma stage, which signifies the frequency of defects or errors. It supplies the framework for understanding the place enhancements are wanted within the course of.
The diligent utility of those ideas will allow organizations to realize a extra profound understanding of their operational efficiency and attempt for enhanced effectivity and improved product high quality. It’s crucial that organizations undertake a rigorous strategy to precisely calculate sigma stage and actively make the most of this data to drive course of optimization initiatives, and to make sure that sigma turns into greater than only a quantity, and turns into a mirrored image of the work they put in.
