Final Twelve Months, or LTM, represents a monetary measurement overlaying the trailing twelve months of an organization’s efficiency. Figuring out this determine entails aggregating monetary knowledge from the earlier 4 quarters or 52 weeks. For instance, to reach on the LTM income as of September 30, 2024, one would sum the income figures from October 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024. This rolling interval offers a extra present view of efficiency than relying solely on annual stories, which can be a number of months outdated.
The importance of analyzing a enterprise utilizing the earlier 12 months lies in its skill to disclose latest tendencies and patterns. It gives a extra up-to-date snapshot in comparison with relying solely on fiscal 12 months knowledge, which can obscure latest efficiency shifts. This attitude is efficacious for traders, collectors, and administration groups evaluating the companys present well being and future prospects. Traditionally, the observe of reviewing trailing efficiency has gained prominence on account of its adaptability to dynamic market situations.
Understanding the calculation of this monetary metric allows knowledgeable decision-making in a number of key areas, together with monetary evaluation, efficiency analysis, and strategic planning. The next sections will element the particular strategies for compiling the information, frequent functions of the data, and potential limitations to contemplate when decoding this vital metric. Moreover, the a part of speech of “LTM” as used within the question is an adjective, modifying the implied noun of a measurement interval (e.g., “LTM efficiency”, “LTM income”). This adjectival nature is essential for appropriately decoding and making use of the idea.
1. Knowledge Supply Identification
Efficient dedication of Final Twelve Months (LTM) figures relies upon critically on correct identification of the sources from which monetary knowledge is extracted. The reliability and representativeness of the resultant LTM calculation hinge on the choice of applicable and constant information. This preliminary step dictates the integrity of subsequent monetary evaluation.
-
Earnings Assertion Accuracy
The revenue assertion, often known as the revenue and loss assertion, serves as the first supply for income and expense knowledge in LTM calculations. Using a appropriately ready revenue assertion is paramount, necessitating validation of its adherence to accounting requirements (e.g., GAAP or IFRS). Inaccurate or misrepresented revenue assertion knowledge results in a flawed LTM calculation, probably skewing monetary ratios and deceptive stakeholders. For instance, improper income recognition inside the revenue assertion will immediately have an effect on the calculated LTM income determine.
-
Steadiness Sheet Utilization
Whereas the revenue assertion offers the majority of the information, the steadiness sheet additionally contributes to sure LTM analyses. Understanding modifications in working capital, for example, requires info extracted from consecutive steadiness sheets. Correct LTM calculations of metrics like free money move necessitate dependable knowledge from the steadiness sheet concerning capital expenditures and modifications in web working capital. Errors in steadiness sheet figures will propagate into incorrect LTM money move assessments.
-
Subsidiary Knowledge Consolidation
For organizations with a number of subsidiaries, correct knowledge consolidation is important. Every subsidiary’s monetary information should be precisely translated and aggregated into the consolidated monetary statements used for LTM calculation. Inconsistencies in accounting insurance policies or foreign money translation strategies throughout subsidiaries can introduce errors into the consolidated LTM figures. Overlooking intercompany transactions or failing to eradicate them appropriately can even distort the consolidated LTM outcomes.
-
Consistency of Reporting Durations
Aligning the reporting intervals for all knowledge sources is essential. The chosen twelve-month interval should be constant throughout all sources (revenue assertion, steadiness sheet, and so forth.). Discrepancies in reporting intervals, akin to utilizing a 52-week 12 months for one knowledge supply and calendar quarters for an additional, will end in an inaccurate LTM calculation. Sustaining a uniform timeframe ensures that the aggregated monetary knowledge genuinely represents the trailing twelve months of efficiency.
The previous components are central to making sure knowledge reliability and immediately impacts the ensuing metrics. When the choice of applicable and verified knowledge is completed thoughtfully, the output delivers the information as anticipated to ship a dependable and actionable monetary evaluation.
2. Constant Interval Alignment
The accuracy of an LTM calculation essentially depends on constant interval alignment throughout all knowledge sources. Misalignment in timeframes introduces inaccuracies, rendering the derived metrics unreliable for monetary evaluation. This side just isn’t merely a procedural step; it’s a foundational requirement for guaranteeing the LTM worth displays a real illustration of the trailing twelve months. As an illustration, contemplate a state of affairs the place an organization makes use of calendar quarters for its revenue assertion knowledge however employs a 52-week fiscal 12 months ending on a distinct date. Instantly summing these figures would incorporate knowledge from kind of than twelve months, distorting the LTM calculation and resulting in probably flawed conclusions concerning the firm’s monetary well being. Due to this fact, guaranteeing that every one knowledge factors correspond to the exact and supposed trailing twelve-month interval is paramount.
The sensible implications of constant interval alignment prolong past mere computational correctness. In funding evaluation, evaluating LTM income progress between two firms is simply significant if each calculations adhere to the identical trailing twelve-month interval. A discrepancy within the interval coated introduces a bias, probably deceptive traders concerning the relative efficiency of the 2 corporations. Equally, when assessing an organization’s compliance with debt covenants which are based mostly on LTM EBITDA, a misaligned interval might erroneously recommend a breach or compliance, impacting financing choices and creditor relations. Moreover, inner managerial choices based mostly on skewed LTM knowledge, akin to useful resource allocation or efficiency goal setting, can have detrimental penalties for a corporation’s strategic aims.
In abstract, the need of constant interval alignment underscores its central position within the calculation of LTM values. Failure to make sure temporal consistency throughout knowledge sources not solely introduces numerical errors but in addition undermines the reliability and utility of the ensuing monetary insights. The challenges in attaining this alignment, significantly inside advanced organizations with numerous reporting buildings, necessitate rigorous knowledge validation and reconciliation processes. Recognizing the elemental significance of this step hyperlinks on to the broader objective of producing significant and reliable monetary knowledge for knowledgeable decision-making.
3. Correct Summation
Correct summation varieties a cornerstone within the derivation of a Final Twelve Months (LTM) metric, representing a crucial stage the place the integrity of collected monetary knowledge is paramount. This course of immediately impacts the validity of the resultant LTM determine and, consequently, the reliability of any subsequent monetary analyses predicated upon it. Errors launched in the course of the summation section irrevocably compromise the utility of the LTM metric.
-
Knowledge Integrity and Traceability
Correct summation calls for meticulous consideration to knowledge integrity, guaranteeing that every particular person knowledge level contributes appropriately to the full. This necessitates a sturdy audit path, permitting for traceability of every worth to its authentic supply doc. As an illustration, when summing quarterly revenues to find out annual gross sales, every quarter’s determine should be verified towards the official quarterly stories. An absence of traceability exposes the LTM calculation to the chance of incorporating misguided or fraudulent knowledge, which immediately impairs its usefulness for decision-making.
-
Consistency in Calculation Strategies
Consistency within the utilized calculation strategies is a non-negotiable requirement for correct summation. The identical strategy to aggregating monetary knowledge should be uniformly utilized all through the whole LTM calculation course of. For instance, if an organization makes use of a weighted common value of capital (WACC) calculation in a single quarter, it can not use a easy common in one other when calculating LTM prices. Inconsistent methodologies introduce systematic biases that undermine the comparability of various intervals inside the LTM timeframe. Inconsistent calculation approaches inevitably distort the true monetary image, rendering comparisons between LTM figures over totally different time intervals meaningless.
-
Dealing with of Unfavourable Values
The correct dealing with of detrimental values, significantly within the context of bills and losses, is significant. Merely ignoring or misinterpreting detrimental numbers can result in important errors within the LTM summation. For instance, if an organization incurs a one-time loss in a particular quarter, the corresponding detrimental worth should be appropriately integrated when calculating LTM web revenue. Failure to take action will artificially inflate the LTM profitability metric, deceptive traders and stakeholders concerning the firm’s precise monetary standing. Unfavourable values should be handled with the identical degree of precision as constructive values to make sure the reliability of the LTM metric.
-
Elimination of Double Counting
The correct summation process should diligently eradicate any cases of double counting. That is significantly related in organizations with advanced intercompany transactions or intra-group income streams. Income or bills which are recorded a number of occasions should be recognized and eradicated from the LTM calculation to stop an overstatement of economic efficiency. For instance, in an organization with a number of subsidiaries, if a single transaction is recorded as income in a single subsidiary and as an expense in one other with out correct reconciliation, the consolidated LTM income will probably be artificially inflated. Eradicating double-counted components ensures a real and correct illustration of the companys general monetary efficiency.
These parts immediately illustrate that precision in summing values can’t be an afterthought. With out the right implementation of those, the integrity and usefulness of the Final Twelve Months metric are critically undermined, probably inflicting misinformed enterprise choices.
4. Foreign money Consistency
Within the context of calculating monetary efficiency over the Final Twelve Months (LTM), foreign money consistency emerges as a crucial issue, significantly for multinational firms that function throughout numerous foreign money zones. With out strict adherence to foreign money consistency, the resultant LTM figures could be deceptive, impacting the accuracy of economic evaluation and strategic choices. The method of aggregating monetary knowledge spanning a number of currencies calls for meticulous consideration to the conversion strategies employed and the timing of these conversions.
-
Number of an Acceptable Alternate Charge
The choice of an applicable trade fee is foundational to foreign money consistency. Corporations sometimes select between utilizing common trade charges for the interval or spot charges on the finish of every reporting interval. Utilizing common charges smooths out the influence of foreign money fluctuations all year long, offering a extra consultant view of the corporate’s underlying efficiency. Conversely, spot charges provide a snapshot of the foreign money values at a particular cut-off date, which could be helpful for steadiness sheet objects. The selection between these strategies ought to be persistently utilized throughout all intervals included within the LTM calculation. For instance, if an organization converts month-to-month income from euros to U.S. {dollars} utilizing the typical month-to-month trade fee, it should adhere to this technique for all twelve months included within the LTM calculation. Any deviation would introduce inconsistencies that distort the ultimate figures.
-
Timing of Foreign money Conversions
The timing of foreign money conversions critically influences the accuracy of LTM figures. Monetary knowledge ought to ideally be transformed into the reporting foreign money on the identical time it’s recorded within the supply system. This strategy minimizes the chance of utilizing outdated trade charges that not replicate the present market situations. Delaying foreign money conversions till the top of the reporting interval can introduce substantial distortions, significantly in risky foreign money markets. As an illustration, if an organization waits till the top of the quarter to transform all overseas foreign money transactions, a major foreign money swing in the course of the quarter might materially influence the reported LTM outcomes. Making certain well timed foreign money conversions helps keep foreign money consistency and reduces the chance of misrepresenting the corporate’s true monetary efficiency.
-
Software of Constant Accounting Requirements
The applying of constant accounting requirements, significantly these associated to overseas foreign money translation, is important for foreign money consistency. Corporations should comply with a acknowledged set of accounting ideas, akin to GAAP or IFRS, and apply these ideas persistently throughout all subsidiaries and reporting items. Variations in accounting requirements can lead to inconsistencies in how overseas foreign money beneficial properties and losses are acknowledged, which might considerably have an effect on LTM profitability. For instance, if one subsidiary acknowledges foreign money beneficial properties and losses instantly within the revenue assertion whereas one other defers them to a later interval, the consolidated LTM figures will probably be distorted. Adhering to constant accounting requirements ensures that every one currency-related transactions are handled uniformly, enhancing the reliability of the LTM calculation.
-
Impression of Hyperinflationary Economies
Working in hyperinflationary economies presents distinctive challenges for foreign money consistency in LTM calculations. In such environments, foreign money values can erode quickly, making historic monetary knowledge much less related. Corporations working in hyperinflationary economies could must restate their monetary statements to replicate present buying energy earlier than calculating LTM figures. This sometimes entails adjusting historic knowledge utilizing a basic value index to account for the consequences of inflation. Failing to regulate for hyperinflation can result in severely deceptive LTM outcomes. As an illustration, income earned in a hyperinflationary foreign money a 12 months in the past could also be just about insignificant when it comes to present buying energy. Ignoring the consequences of hyperinflation can distort the notion of the companys precise monetary efficiency and undermine the validity of its LTM calculations.
In conclusion, foreign money consistency is an indispensable aspect in calculating Final Twelve Months monetary metrics, significantly in globalized enterprise environments. By guaranteeing applicable trade fee choice, well timed conversions, constant accounting requirements, and changes for hyperinflation, organizations can improve the reliability and accuracy of their LTM calculations, offering a strong basis for knowledgeable decision-making and strategic planning.
5. Exclusion of Irregular Objects
The precept of excluding irregular objects when computing Final Twelve Months (LTM) metrics is key to deriving a consultant and significant view of ongoing operational efficiency. Irregular objects, by their very nature, are non-recurring and might considerably distort monetary figures, thereby undermining the reliability of LTM analyses if included.
-
Impression on Development Evaluation
The presence of one-time beneficial properties or losses inside the LTM interval can obfuscate underlying tendencies. For instance, a considerable acquire from the sale of a non-core asset would artificially inflate income and profitability for that interval. Together with this merchandise would make present operational efficiency seem stronger than it really is, hindering correct pattern evaluation. The exclusion of such objects allows a clearer view of the particular trajectory of the core enterprise.
-
Enhanced Comparability
Excluding irregular objects enhances comparability throughout totally different intervals and amongst totally different firms. Corporations usually encounter distinctive occasions that skew their monetary outcomes. By adjusting for these occasions, analysts can higher examine the standardized efficiency of assorted entities, or the efficiency of a single entity throughout distinct intervals. That is essential for benchmarking, valuation, and funding decision-making. With out such changes, comparisons turn into inherently flawed and fewer informative.
-
Facilitating Correct Forecasting
Correct monetary forecasting requires understanding an organization’s sustainable efficiency, not efficiency influenced by anomalies. Together with irregular objects in LTM calculations can distort future projections. If forecasts are based mostly on LTM figures that embrace atypical beneficial properties, the ensuing projections are prone to be overly optimistic and unrealistic. Excluding these things permits for the creation of extra dependable and knowledgeable forecasts.
-
Improved Resolution-Making
Enterprise choices, whether or not strategic or operational, ought to be predicated on a transparent understanding of the corporate’s sustainable efficiency. Counting on LTM figures that incorporate irregular objects can result in suboptimal decisions. As an illustration, an organization may overinvest in a section experiencing a short lived surge on account of a non-recurring occasion. By specializing in LTM figures adjusted for irregular objects, decision-makers acquire a extra life like foundation for useful resource allocation, strategic planning, and efficiency analysis.
In abstract, the exclusion of irregular objects when calculating LTM figures ensures that the ensuing metrics are indicative of ongoing enterprise operations, enhancing the reliability and utility of economic evaluation. This observe facilitates extra correct pattern evaluation, improved comparability, extra dependable forecasting, and better-informed decision-making.
6. Verification of Calculations
The method of verifying calculations stands as a crucial checkpoint within the correct derivation of Final Twelve Months (LTM) figures. This procedural step mitigates errors, ensures knowledge integrity, and validates the reliability of the resultant monetary metrics. With out rigorous verification, the utility of LTM knowledge for decision-making is severely compromised.
-
Unbiased Validation of Knowledge Sources
Verification entails independently validating knowledge sources to verify their accuracy and consistency. This requires cross-referencing knowledge towards authentic information, akin to monetary statements, gross sales stories, and expense logs. For instance, verifying that quarterly income figures used within the LTM calculation match the audited quarterly stories offers assurance towards transcription errors or knowledge manipulation. Failing to validate knowledge sources exposes the LTM calculation to the chance of incorporating flawed info, thereby undermining its accuracy.
-
Algorithmic and Components Audits
A crucial part of verification is conducting algorithmic and components audits. This entails scrutinizing the formulation and calculation strategies used to derive the LTM figures to make sure they’re logically sound and appropriately carried out. Software program instruments and spreadsheets usually include errors that may propagate by means of the calculation course of. As an illustration, guaranteeing that the right weighting components are utilized when averaging foreign money trade charges is important for accuracy. Algorithm audits establish and rectify these errors, enhancing the general reliability of the LTM calculation.
-
Peer Overview and Cross-Purposeful Verification
Peer evaluation and cross-functional verification provide an extra layer of scrutiny by partaking a number of people with numerous experience. This course of entails having one other certified skilled independently evaluation the LTM calculations and methodologies. For instance, partaking a monetary analyst from a distinct division to evaluation the LTM calculations might help establish errors or biases that is likely to be missed by the unique preparer. Cross-functional verification enhances the objectivity and comprehensiveness of the validation course of.
-
Reconciliation with Prior Durations
Reconciling LTM figures with prior intervals offers a precious verify for reasonableness and consistency. This entails evaluating the present LTM outcomes with these of earlier years or quarters to establish any surprising variations or anomalies. Vital deviations warrant additional investigation to find out their trigger and validity. For instance, a sudden spike in LTM income that’s not supported by underlying market tendencies could point out an error within the calculation or a misrepresentation of economic efficiency. Reconciliation with prior intervals helps be sure that the LTM figures are constant and aligned with historic tendencies.
These sides converge to emphasise that the “easy methods to calculate ltm” course of is incomplete with out sturdy verification measures. Incorporating these components safeguards the integrity of the monetary knowledge, fostering confidence within the resultant LTM metrics and in the end supporting sound enterprise choices.
7. Common Updates
The mixing of routine updates into the method of calculating Final Twelve Months (LTM) figures immediately influences the relevance and actionable nature of the derived monetary metrics. An LTM calculation, by its nature, goals to supply a present evaluation of economic efficiency. Nonetheless, the passage of time erodes the temporal relevance of the information. Periodic updates mitigate this impact, guaranteeing the LTM determine displays the latest operational actions. As an illustration, an organization that calculates LTM income solely on the fiscal year-end neglects to include the most recent quarterly outcomes, thereby presenting a probably outdated monetary snapshot. Common updates, akin to month-to-month or quarterly recalculations, present a dynamic perspective, revealing evolving tendencies and potential shifts in enterprise efficiency that an rare calculation would miss.
The sensible significance of frequently up to date LTM metrics is especially evident in dynamic enterprise environments. Contemplate a retail firm working in a quickly altering market. Month-to-month LTM gross sales knowledge permits administration to shortly establish rising tendencies, akin to shifts in shopper preferences or the influence of promotional campaigns. This well timed info allows responsive changes to advertising and marketing methods, stock administration, and pricing choices. Conversely, an annual LTM calculation offers a delayed and fewer actionable view, probably resulting in missed alternatives or delayed responses to antagonistic market situations. Moreover, within the realm of funding evaluation, frequently up to date LTM metrics empower traders to make extra knowledgeable choices based mostly on probably the most present evaluation of an organization’s monetary well being.
In conclusion, integrating routine updates just isn’t merely a procedural addendum to calculating LTM figures; it’s a basic aspect that dictates the utility and relevance of the resultant monetary insights. The frequency of updates should align with the particular wants and dynamics of the enterprise atmosphere. Whereas extra frequent updates present a extra present perspective, additionally they require higher useful resource allocation and knowledge administration. The optimum replace frequency represents a steadiness between timeliness and practicality. Ignoring common updates undermines the aim of the LTM calculation, remodeling it from a dynamic software for decision-making right into a static and probably deceptive historic artifact.
Incessantly Requested Questions Concerning Final Twelve Months (LTM) Calculations
The next questions deal with frequent considerations and misconceptions concerning the calculation and interpretation of Final Twelve Months (LTM) monetary metrics. Understanding these elements is essential for correct monetary evaluation.
Query 1: Is it acceptable to make use of projected knowledge when figuring out LTM figures?
Projected or forecasted knowledge shouldn’t be integrated into Final Twelve Months calculations. LTM depends solely on historic monetary info to supply an correct view of previous efficiency. Introducing projections would compromise the objectivity and reliability of the metric.
Query 2: Can the LTM interval deviate from the usual trailing twelve months?
Whereas the time period “LTM” inherently implies the trailing twelve months, there could also be cases the place a barely totally different interval is used, akin to a trailing 52-week interval. Nonetheless, any deviation from the usual trailing twelve months ought to be clearly disclosed to keep away from confusion and guarantee transparency.
Query 3: How are partial-year monetary statements dealt with in an LTM calculation?
Partial-year monetary statements ought to be annualized to supply a comparable determine for the total twelve-month interval. This annualization sometimes entails scaling the partial-year knowledge to replicate a full 12 months’s value of exercise. The tactic of annualization ought to be clearly documented and persistently utilized.
Query 4: What’s the most well-liked technique for dealing with foreign money translation in LTM calculations?
The popular technique for foreign money translation in LTM calculations is to make use of common trade charges for the interval being thought-about. This strategy smooths out fluctuations in trade charges and offers a extra consultant view of the corporate’s underlying efficiency. Spot charges ought to be prevented as they symbolize solely a snapshot in time.
Query 5: Are there particular industries the place LTM calculations are significantly related?
LTM calculations are broadly relevant throughout numerous industries, however are significantly related in sectors characterised by speedy change or differences due to the season. Retail, know-how, and healthcare are examples of industries the place LTM knowledge offers well timed insights into evolving market situations.
Query 6: How steadily ought to LTM figures be up to date to keep up their relevance?
The frequency of LTM updates relies on the dynamics of the enterprise atmosphere and the data wants of stakeholders. At a minimal, LTM figures ought to be up to date quarterly to include the latest monetary outcomes. In some circumstances, extra frequent updates, akin to month-to-month, could also be warranted.
Understanding the suitable utility of those responses will improve correct, well timed insights. Avoiding reliance on projections, sustaining interval consistency, and managing foreign money translation successfully are crucial for knowledgeable monetary evaluation.
The following part will delve into potential limitations related to utilizing the figures, offering a balanced perspective on the metric’s utility and scope.
Steerage on Calculating Final Twelve Months (LTM)
Adhering to particular tips enhances the accuracy and relevance of economic metrics. The next suggestions present course for calculating Final Twelve Months figures, guaranteeing a dependable foundation for monetary evaluation.
Tip 1: Prioritize Knowledge Supply Integrity: Confirm the accuracy of information retrieved from revenue statements, steadiness sheets, and subsidiary ledgers earlier than initiating calculations. Guarantee adherence to plain accounting ideas, akin to GAAP or IFRS. Inaccurate knowledge on the supply compromises subsequent metrics.
Tip 2: Implement Interval Alignment: Align the measurement intervals throughout all knowledge sources. Misalignment introduces errors that may considerably skew outcomes. Affirm all knowledge corresponds to the exact trailing twelve-month interval to make sure temporal consistency.
Tip 3: Make use of Exact Summation Methods: Train diligence in summation to avert errors. Constant utility of methodologies throughout intervals is non-negotiable. A single miscalculated worth can distort the LTM determine and subsequently misinform decision-making.
Tip 4: Handle Foreign money Translations Methodically: Multinational firms should handle foreign money translations methodically. Constant utility of translation strategies throughout all subsidiaries is essential. Inconsistencies in utility can introduce important inaccuracies in consolidated figures.
Tip 5: Prudently Deal with Irregular Objects: Fastidiously look at and judiciously deal with irregular objects akin to one-time beneficial properties and losses. This stuff can considerably skew outcomes. Eradicating irregular components offers a clearer perspective on underlying operational efficiency.
Tip 6: Implement Verification Processes: Combine verification steps at every stage of the calculation course of to make sure accuracy. Peer evaluation, cross-functional validation, and reconciliation with earlier intervals safeguard knowledge integrity and improve metric credibility.
Tip 7: Replace LTM Figures Repeatedly: Sustaining relevance mandates constant, scheduled updates. Carry out periodic recalculations, incorporating the latest monetary knowledge to make sure the metric stays aligned with present enterprise realities. Stale knowledge yields questionable insights.
Implementing these steps ensures Final Twelve Months analyses are predicated on reliable knowledge, offering dependable insights for strategic decision-making and monetary evaluation.
In conclusion, recognizing the restrictions of the time period “easy methods to calculate ltm”, together with its reliance on historic knowledge and potential for misinterpretation, is important for a holistic view. The following part addresses constraints and various concerns for a extra complete monetary perspective.
Conclusion
The previous sections have explored the methodologies underpinning the Final Twelve Months calculation, emphasizing knowledge integrity, interval alignment, and verification processes. Correct dedication requires rigorous adherence to accounting requirements, constant foreign money translations, and the even handed dealing with of irregular objects. Repeatedly up to date metrics present a dynamic perspective, revealing evolving tendencies, and potential shifts in efficiency that rare calculations could obscure. The a part of speech of LTM as an adjective has been established as essential for understanding its utility.
Nonetheless, understanding easy methods to calculate LTM additionally necessitates a recognition of its limitations. The LTM calculation is inherently backward-looking, based mostly solely on historic knowledge. This inherent lag diminishes its predictive energy and should not totally replicate rising alternatives or impending dangers. Due to this fact, whereas the LTM offers a precious snapshot of previous efficiency, it should be complemented by forward-looking analyses, strategic forecasts, and a complete evaluation of market dynamics to tell sound enterprise choices. Reliance solely on a technique can result in an incomplete and probably deceptive monetary evaluation.
